Total Quality Management vs Six Sigma: Choosing Excellence

What is Total Quality Management (TQM)?

Total Quality Management (TQM) involves the continual identification and reduction, or elimination, of errors in manufacturing processes. Its primary objectives include optimizing supply chain management, enhancing the customer experience, and ensuring thorough employee training. 

Some companies implementing TQM include Phillips Semiconductor, Ford Motor Company, Motorola, and Toyota Motor Company.

TQM's core aim is to uphold collective accountability among all stakeholders involved in the production process, aiming for superior quality in the final product or service.

Key Points

• TQM is an ongoing process focused on identifying and minimizing errors.
• It aims to streamline supply chain management, enhance customer service, and ensure comprehensive employee training.
• The central goal is to elevate an organization's goods and services outputs by continually refining internal practices.
• TQM strives for accountability among all parties engaged in the production process.
• It typically adheres to eight guiding principles, emphasizing customer focus, continuous improvement, and adherence to efficient processes.

Pros of Total Quality Management

1. Enhanced Product Quality: By placing customers at the core, TQM prioritizes delivering superior quality products. It leverages customer-focused, data-driven decisions across the value chain, ensuring better offerings.
2. Improved Brand Reputation: Companies implementing TQM principles tend to bolster their brand image, leading to positive word-of-mouth and increased sales stemming from satisfied customers' experiences.
3. Reduced Product Defects: Rigorous data analysis and statistical process control within documented processes enable early identification and rectification of product defects, minimizing issues in the development phase.
4. Lower Operational Costs: Despite initial investments, widespread implementation involving all employees can substantially cut down long-term costs across the organization, proving cost-effective in the long run.
5. Decreased Waste: TQM's focus on value-driven initiatives aids in reducing time-to-market and material costs, leading to minimizing waste across various business segments, resulting in higher-quality products and increased customer satisfaction.
6. Defined Company Values: TQM necessitates organizational alignment with defined values, fostering effective communication and ingraining these values into the company culture and operations.
7. Adaptability to Change: TQM cultivates an environment where stakeholders can promptly detect and respond to shifting consumer preferences. Moreover, its structured processes facilitate swift adaptation to regulatory alterations, as all procedures are documented and easily modifiable to meet evolving customer demands.

Cons of Total Quality Management

1. Significant Initial Investment: Adopting TQM demands a substantial financial commitment due to its holistic approach, necessitating a shift in mindset, meticulous project management, comprehensive process documentation, and extensive training, particularly in the initial stages.
2. Expertise Requirement: Successfully implementing TQM requires thorough knowledge and expertise. While hiring top consulting firms isn't mandatory, a clear action plan and expert guidance are essential for effective implementation.
3. Employee Resistance to Change: Organizations with long-standing employees accustomed to different management approaches face challenges garnering full stakeholder support. Overcoming this resistance requires effective communication and clarity.
4. Initial Revelations of Customer Dissatisfaction: Transitioning to TQM may initially highlight flaws in business processes and areas lacking in customer satisfaction across various business domains. Embracing these as opportunities for continuous improvement is crucial.
5. Ongoing Feedback and Training: TQM isn't a quick-fix solution; it necessitates continual feedback from employees, customers, and partners, coupled with ongoing training to incorporate new insights and process enhancements.
6. Time to Display Results: Implementation or operationalization of TQM requires a clear evaluation plan to measure improvements in the short and long term. It might take a considerable amount of time before substantial results become evident.
7. Potential Constraints on Creativity and Flexibility: Overemphasis on data-driven approaches within TQM might sometimes hinder creativity and adaptability in today's dynamic digital landscape. Striking a balance between adaptability and process orientation is essential for successful TQM implementation.

What is Six Sigma?

Six Sigma is a quality improvement methodology focusing on identifying and eliminating defects within a process. Originating in 1984, Motorola engineer Bill Smith created Six Sigma to minimize variations in their electronic manufacturing, thereby reducing product defects.

Since its inception, the strategies, tools, and cultural norms underpinning the Six Sigma management system have been embraced by both upper management and project teams across diverse industries, aiming to enhance operational excellence.

Furthermore, the definition of "defect" has evolved to encompass any inadequacy in business processes hindering a company from fulfilling its customers' requirements.

Some companies that have successfully implemented Six Sigma are 3M, Amazon, Atos, BAE Systems, and Bank of America.

Pros of Six Sigma

1. Assured Success: Companies implementing Six Sigma successfully across various operational domains have experienced substantial benefits. This methodology has contributed to increased sales, improved stock value, enhanced customer satisfaction, and multifaceted business advancements. Notably, General Electric saved over $8 billion within the initial three years of adopting Six Sigma.
2. Value Enhancement: Six Sigma plays a crucial role in augmenting the value and quality of a business organization's outputs, be it products or services. It aids in optimizing supply chain processes and elevating customer satisfaction. Once integrated, Six Sigma becomes ingrained in the business culture, enabling the systematic enhancement of processes.
3. Waste Reduction and Learning: Six Sigma's proactive approach identifies errors and discrepancies beforehand, effectively minimizing wastage and reducing operational costs, thereby boosting profitability. Moreover, it fosters a learning environment within the organization by documenting and analyzing processes, offering valuable insights to both experts and employees regarding process efficiency.

Cons of Six Sigma

1. Challenging Implementation: Full engagement of all employees involved in operations and other business processes is imperative for successful Six Sigma implementation. While feasible in smaller companies, deploying Six Sigma in larger organizations can present practical challenges due to its scale.
2. Complexity: Six Sigma scrutinizes business processes extensively, generating substantial statistical and empirical data. Analyzing this data to identify variances can be intricate and time-consuming, especially when maintained over an extended period, posing complexities in the execution and sustenance of the process.
3. Long-term Costs: While initially aimed at cost-saving, prolonged implementation of Six Sigma as a quality improvement process may lead to increased overhead and operational costs beyond a certain threshold, potentially outweighing its benefits.

TQM vs Six Sigma: Key Differences 

Some of the key differences between TQM and Six Sigma are

1. Focus:

• TQM emphasizes quantitative goals related to individual departments, aiming at overall customer satisfaction.
• Six Sigma employs a data-driven, statistical approach across multiple departments to detect and eliminate defects impacting process quality. It primarily focuses on defect identification and elimination.

2. Approach:

• TQM views quality as conformity to internal requirements, while Six Sigma enhances quality by reducing defects, operational costs, cycle time and identifying non-value-added costs.

3. Quality Improvement:

• TQM maintains existing quality standards by aligning the actions of employees and addressing underperforming segments.
• Six Sigma improves quality through process changes, aiming to achieve near-perfect quality by introducing new measures and reducing imperfections.

4. Skills Required:

• Six Sigma requires trained professionals (Green or Black Belts), while non-dedicated managers manage TQM without extensive training.

5. Approach to Results:

• Six Sigma is result-oriented and precision-focused, while TQM follows traditional approaches with a less targeted outcome.

6. Tools Used:

• Common tools for TQM include Ishikawa diagrams, histograms, control charts, check sheets, and flowcharts.
• Six Sigma tools encompass DMAIC, Pareto charts, Kanban systems, Kaizen, FMEA, value stream mapping, and the 5S system, aiming for structured problem-solving and process improvement.

Boost your career path as a skilled quality management expert with our Lean Six Sigma Expert Training aligned with the LSS-Green Belt and Black Belt certification from IASSC. Contact us and get ahead in your career right away!

Conclusion

In Six Sigma, data analysis is employed to pinpoint the error rate that can be eliminated to achieve optimal quality standards. On the other hand, TQM utilizes data to evaluate the alignment of business processes with the expected operational quality of the company. Additionally, TQM emphasizes using regular data reports to aid in decision-making processes. Six Sigma, with its data-driven precision and focus on defect reduction, tends to offer a more targeted and accurate approach compared to the broader and traditional TQM methodologies.

If you're ready to drive your career forward with total quality management and Six Sigma, enroll in the Lean Six Sigma Expert program today and learn from experts.  

FAQs

1. Which Industries Are Best Suited for TQM and Six Sigma?

Industries such as automotive, biotech, chemical, clothes, shoes, aerospace, aircraft, food, paper, textile, electronics, healthcare, and education best suit TQM and Six Sigma.

2. Is Certification Required to Implement TQM or Six Sigma?

TQM does not need any certification but requires training. However, Six Sigma needs rigorous testing and training and includes multiple levels such as green belt, black belt, and master black belt.

3. Which is More Cost-Effective: TQM or Six Sigma?

TQM involves costs in regard to process modification, training, and, at times, restructuring the organization. However, Six Sigma helps in reducing operational costs by focusing on cycle time reduction, cost savings, and defect reduction.